Thank you for visiting paducahsun.com, the online home of The Paducah Sun.

June 2012
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Click here to submit an event.

Clinton had a legal duty to vigorously defend her loathsome client

By RUTH MARCUS Washington Post Writers Group

WASHINGTON - It should not be necessary to write this column.

Lawyers represent clients. Criminal defense lawyers represent clients accused of crimes - sometimes horrible, evil clients accused of heinous crimes. It is the ethical and professional responsibility of these lawyers to defend those clients as vigorously as possible.

Sometimes such representation results in less than perfectly just results. As Justice Benjamin Cardozo famously put it, the criminal goes free because the constable has blundered. That is the way - the only way - an adversary system of criminal justice can function.

End of story, or it would be, except that the decades-old criminal case at issue here involves Hillary Clinton.

To back up, Clinton - then Hillary Rodham - was a 27-year-old law professor in 1975 running a newly-formed legal aid clinic at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville.

As reported by Glenn Thrush in Newsday in 2008, a "hard-drinking factory worker" named Thomas Alfred Taylor had been accused of raping a 12-year-old girl, the daughter of a family he was living with. Taylor had asked the judge to fire his court-appointed male lawyer and have a female attorney represent him instead. There were only a half-dozen women practicing law in the county at the time, and the judge picked Clinton.

When the prosecutor, Mahlon Gibson, called to tell her the news, "Hillary told me she didn't want to take that case, she made that very clear," Gibson told Newsday. Clinton herself described the incident in her autobiography, "Living History": "I really didn't feel comfortable taking on such a client, but Mahlon gently reminded me that I couldn't very well refuse the judge's request."

So Clinton went to work. She mounted an attack on the physical evidence against Taylor, enlisting a noted forensics expert to cast doubt on the validity of the physical evidence against her client.

And, as is distasteful but common in rape cases, Clinton prepared to attack the victim's credibility. Requesting that the victim undergo a psychiatric examination, Clinton wrote in an affidavit, "I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing. I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body."

Was there a basis for this claim? The victim says not; the state's investigator doesn't recall such evidence; the records were lost in a flood. In any event, the forensic attack carried the day; the prosecutor reduced the charges from first-degree rape to unlawful fondling of a minor. Taylor received four years' probation and a year in jail.

This story was revived recently after the Washington Free Beacon unearthed audiotapes of interviews conducted by reporter Roy Reed and deposited at the University of Arkansas. "I had him take a polygraph, which he passed - which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs," Clinton recalled, and chuckled.

"What was sad about it was that the prosecutor had evidence, among which was his underwear ... which was bloody," she recalled. The crime lab "neatly cut out the part that they were going to test," came back with results, and promptly sent back the underpants with a hole - having thrown away the crucial piece. So Clinton presented the prosecutor with her expert's credentials and announced, "This guy's ready to come from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice." Again, chuckling.

To the Free Beacon, this story "calls into question Clinton's narrative of her early years as a devoted women and children's advocate in Arkansas." In its view, Clinton "struck a casual and complacent attitude toward her client and the trial for rape of a minor."

Let's stipulate: Clinton's laughter can sometimes be off-putting; she tends to use it as a way to deflect unwelcome questions. Not in this case. Certainly, Clinton could express more empathy for the girl. But her laughter, as I hear it, is at the vagaries of the system and bureaucratic ineptitude, not the victim.

In short: Feel free to dislike Clinton. Feel free to believe she'd be a terrible president. Don't blame her for doing her job. The real scandal in this case would have been if she had let her feminist ideology trump her ethical responsibility - to zealously represent even the most loathsome client.

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Your comment has been submitted for approval
captcha cfe6dae4636245c8829667bbb8802962
Top Classifieds
  • HAVANESE PUPS AKC Home Raised, Best H ... Details
  • Cocker Spaniel Pup - AKC (270)476-258 ... Details
  • PILLOW TOPmattress sets NEW in plasti ... Details
  • Pride Lift Chair Like new, $500 270- ... Details
  • Mature Professional Seeks to rent hou ... Details
  • Hummel Figurines & Plates, Carniv ... Details
  • Pride lift chair, excellent working c ... Details
  • Cash for farms & gold (270)339-8 ... Details
  • RUNNING, fixable, junk vehicles, equi ... Details
  • 4010 Maxon Rd. 1.33 Acres, 4 BD. 3.5 ... Details
  • 185 AC. ESTATE Rolling hills, l ... Details
  • 16x80 2 bd., 2 b, Call for info. $17 ... Details
  • SEEING is believing! Don't buy p ... Details
  • 2000 Dutchman 20 ft Pop-up Camper. Ve ... Details
  • FOR SALE: 2012 Hyundai Santa Fe SUV 4 ... Details
  • Ford Mustang '04 V6 78k $4,900 2 ... Details
  • FOR SALE: 1993 Honda GL1500AP Goldwin ... Details
  • JOE'S BACKHOE SERVICE Install &a ... Details
This Week In Photos
Most Popular
  1. Tilghman unable to stop Bruin run attack
  2. On television
  3. Correction
  1. Stock market ends turbulent week on more placid note
  2. Harrah's revenue, admissions show jump this year over 2014
  3. Tilghman unable to stop Bruin run attack
  1. Tilghman unable to stop Bruin run attack
  2. On television
  3. Correction

Check out these recently discussed stories and voice your opinion...