Welcome

Thank you for visiting paducahsun.com, the online home of The Paducah Sun.

Calendar
June 2012
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Click here to submit an event.

TRAP Ruling provides reason to refine gun-buyer law

Suppose you are an outdoorsman in a small town looking for a particular model of shotgun. You can't find it in your market. But you happen to learn in a conversation with a cousin in another town that the gun is available there at a good price. The cousin offers to buy it and send it to you if you will send him a check to cover the purchase. Both you and your cousin are good citizens entitled by law to buy a gun. Would it surprise you to learn that if your cousin buys the gun for you, it's a crime?

So says the U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 opinion this week.

The case had to do with so-called "straw" purchases of firearms. A federal law prohibits purchases of firearms by a person who is not the "actual buyer." A form that is signed during the purchase/background check part of the transaction requires the buyer to affirm that he or she is the actual end user.

The intent of the provision is to prevent someone from buying a gun or guns and transferring it/them to someone who is not legally entitled to buy or possess a firearm - a gang member with a felony record, someone who has been adjudicated mentally ill, or someone who has exceeded the limit on gun purchases in a single month, for instance.

The purpose of the law - keeping guns out of the hands of criminals or others who have no business owning them - is legitimate. But the effect in some cases is to turn honest, well-intentioned people into criminals. Society is not served by that.

The case that went before the Supreme Court involved a former Roanake, Va., police officer named Bruce Abramski who used his police identification to buy a Glock 19 handgun for his uncle at a discount. His uncle sent a check for $400 with "Glock 19 handgun" written on the memo line and that, it turns out, was enough to convict Abramski, who received five years of probation.

The four conservative members of the court, Antonin Scalia, John Roberts, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented to the finding that this transaction was illegal, arguing that by "actual buyer" the law simply means that the person buying the gun must be who he says he is. But Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is almost always the swing vote in close cases, went with the liberals on this one, agreeing that purchases such as Abramski's violate the true intent of the law.

Frankly, given the language of the law and what appears on the purchase forms, we think the majority interpretation is probably correct statutorily. But the point is it shouldn't be.

To that end we think a revision of the language of the law by Congress is in order. It needs to be reworded to make clear that the forbidden activity is the purchase of a gun by a person who intends to transfer it to someone not legally entitled to have it.

While we agree that in this particular case, a retired police officer probably should have known better, clearly the law as presently worded and inconsistently enforced is vague enough to entrap well-meaning, law-abiding citizens. Congress would do well to revise the law in light of this court decision.

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Your comment has been submitted for approval
captcha 64a4c45e21614bf38ed3ff07ab387b25
Top Classifieds
  • AKC Lab Pups *3/Black female $375 *1 ... Details
  • Pugs Registered. Black, Female. Shot ... Details
  • HAVANESE PUPS AKC Home Raised, Best H ... Details
  • CKC Tiny Toy Poodles270-554-4308 Details
  • HAPPY JACK PARACIDE SHAMPOOProvid ... Details
  • F1 Golden Doodles M/F, Beautiful,6 wk ... Details
  • Rottweiler Pups For Sale with or with ... Details
  • Details
  • JOHN DEERE Riding Mower ... Details
  • RUNNING, fixable, junk vehicles, equi ... Details
  • PILLOWTOP Mattress Sets, NEW in plast ... Details
  • MJS Concrete Specializing In:Stamped ... Details
  • ASPHALT & CONCRETE REPAIR, SEALIN ... Details
  • HAWAII, 2 round trip air fares, leav ... Details
  • OPEN HOUSE SUNDAY 2-41906 ST RT 1748, ... Details
  • SEEING is believing! Don't buy p ... Details
  • 127 Acres Lyon CountyLake Barkley- De ... Details
  • Lakewood Villa Condo for Sale - 2460 ... Details
  • 8 Unit Apt. Bldgs. For Sale By Owner ... Details
  • NEW 50x60 steel bldg. equipped w/12x1 ... Details
  • FHA, USDA, VA & Conventional Loan ... Details
  • For Sale/Lease Deerview Estates (Calv ... Details
  • Corner Lot, 1 acre Kevil $16,500 2704 ... Details
  • Duplex By Owner 3 BR 1 BA each side ... Details
  • WATERFRONT MINI-ESTATESecluded, Exec. ... Details
  • FAIRHURST BLDG.295 sq. ft. office1900 ... Details
  • BRK Colonial 4500SF 9 rm, 4br, 5 ba, ... Details
  • Mini camper just for 2. 270-205-0119 Details
  • 1963 Chev. Bel-Air, 2 dr post, 327 5 ... Details
  • JOE'S BACKHOESERVICE Install &am ... Details
  • 39' Heartland Landmark 4 Slides ... Details
  • Chrome Running Boards $300270-331-76 ... Details
  • '08 19 ft. Red/white CaravelleRu ... Details
This Week In Photos
Most Popular
  1. Feds: Action taken to fix mistakenly awarded work permits
  2. WKCTC goes tobacco-free
  3. Newcomb eyeing second professional win
  1. Car radios examined after recall
  2. Discrimination alleged in clerk's office
  3. Sharp contrast at Fancy Farm
  1. Feds: Action taken to fix mistakenly awarded work permits
  2. WKCTC goes tobacco-free
  3. Newcomb eyeing second professional win
Discussion

Check out these recently discussed stories and voice your opinion...