Welcome

Thank you for visiting paducahsun.com, the online home of The Paducah Sun.

Calendar
June 2012
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Click here to submit an event.

Recess appointment case about power

By GEORGE F. WILL Washington Post Writers Group

WASHINGTON - Constitutional arguments that seem as dry as dust can have momentous consequences. On Monday, the Supreme Court's nine fine minds will hear oral arguments about the meaning of "the" and "happen." What they decide could advance the urgent project of reining in rampant executive power.

"The president," says the Constitution, "shall have the power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate" (emphasis added). Monday's case concerns whether Barack Obama made recess appointments when the Senate was not in recess, and made them to fill vacancies that did not happen during a recess.

In 2012, the National Labor Relations Board rendered a decision adverse to a soft-drink bottler in Yakima, Wash. The bottler asked the court to declare the NLRB's intervention unlawful because the board did not have a legitimate quorum, three members having been installed by Obama when the Senate was not in recess as the Framers understood this term.

Republicans, wanting to block some Obama nominations, used a practice Democrats used in 2007 when they controlled the Senate and wanted to block some George W. Bush nominees. Under a unanimous consent agreement - no Democrat objected - pro forma sessions occurred on Jan. 3 and Jan. 6 of 2012. Obama declared the Senate in recess Jan. 4 and made his NLRB appointments, thereby disregarding the Senate's determination of the rules of its proceedings, and the settled practice both parties have used to remain not in recess even when most senators are away.

The Obama administration argues that the word "happen" is a synonym for "exist." And it rejects the argument that an intra-session Senate break is a synonym for "adjournment," not "recess." This, however, ignores the reasonable reading of the definite article: Recess appointments fill vacancies that "happen," meaning come about, during "the" recess of the Senate - the one break that occurs between sessions, which until the Civil War usually lasted only three to six months.

The first president made the first recess appointment in the first year of his first term, in 1789, when travel was slow and arduous, and Congress was usually not in session. The Recess Appointments Clause was written when conditions made such a power crucial. Obama, however, contends that in today's world of instant communication and easy travel, he deserves a much larger - almost unlimited - recess appointment power.

His administration argues that "at least 14 presidents have, collectively, made at least 600 civilian appointments (and thousands of military ones) during intra-session recesses." But Obama's action regarding the NLRB is characteristic of his aggressive expansion of presidential power. He is the first president to make recess appointments when the Senate was convening pro forma sessions every three days, and he has articulated an anti-constitutional defense of his aggression:

"I refuse to take no for an answer. ...When Congress refuses to act ... I have an obligation as president to do what I can without them."

If he really can refuse a "no" answer, then the Senate's role in the appointment process is vitiated. Now the court should apprise him of what he cannot do without Congress. Which means a Madisonian dialectic is occurring: The executive's usurpation of power has provoked the legislature, precipitating an overdue judicial intervention to clarify constitutional boundaries. The Constitution's text, and perhaps its original meaning, may be at odds with historical practice.

Because the ability to defeat by filibuster some presidential nominees has recently been restricted, perhaps not for the last time, presidents will have less need to resort to recess appointments. Nevertheless, were the court to uphold Obama's action, two of the Senate's constitutional powers would be substantially reduced - the power (which the House also has) to "determine the rules of its proceedings," and the power to reject presidential nominees.

Many presidents have chafed against limits to their power, but in progressive presidents normal political ambition is alloyed with a validating ideology. Woodrow Wilson provided the progressive template by disparaging the separation of powers as an anachronistic impediment to the presidential power requisite for the modern age.

Monday's argument will be another manifestation of America's intermittent efforts to tame executive power, efforts that predate nationhood: The Declaration of Independence is a menu of complaints against "a long train of abuses and usurpations" by "the present King of Great Britain." The present president's cavalier approach to statutes (as with his unilateral rewriting of the Affordable Care Act) and the Constitution (see four paragraphs above) make Monday's argument important.

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Your comment has been submitted for approval
captcha 86433762fbc8447ebfba7bbfe13dade4
Top Classifieds
  • Cocker Spaniel Pup - AKC (270)476-258 ... Details
  • Huge Genuine Dark Brown Leather Secti ... Details
  • PILLOW TOPmattress sets NEW in plasti ... Details
  • Cash for farms & gold (270)339-8 ... Details
  • Gehl 1075 Pull Type Silage ChopperGeh ... Details
  • RUNNING, fixable, junk vehicles, equi ... Details
  • SEEING is believing! Don't buy p ... Details
  • 4010 Maxon Rd. 1.33 Acres, 4 BD. 3.5 ... Details
  • 185 AC. ESTATE Rolling hills, l ... Details
  • 1024 Yarbro Ln-2BR,1B,LR NEW Kitchen/ ... Details
  • 2000 Dutchman 20 ft Pop-up Camper. Ve ... Details
  • 49 CC Yamaha Zuma, 49 CC Yamaha Bino8 ... Details
  • 2011 Harley Davidson Ultra Classic Tr ... Details
This Week In Photos
Most Popular
  1. Riley scores 4 in Tiger triumph
  2. Man indicted for drug trafficking
  3. Paducah Tilghman dumps Mayfield
  1. U.S. smoking rate drops to fifteen percent
  2. 2-vehicle wreck seriously hurts motorcylist
  3. Spill closes part of Mississippi River
  1. Appeals court upholds ski mountain's statue of Jesus
  2. Riley scores 4 in Tiger triumph
  3. Man indicted for drug trafficking
Discussion

Check out these recently discussed stories and voice your opinion...