Thank you for visiting paducahsun.com, the online home of The Paducah Sun.

June 2012
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Click here to submit an event.

Terror threats at chemical plants underestimated

WASHINGTON - The government is underestimating the threat of a chemical attack on America's densely populated cities and has failed to inspect virtually all of the chemical facilities that it considers particularly vulnerable to terrorists, congressional investigators say.

The yearlong investigation by Republican staff on the Senate Homeland Security Committee paints a portrait of inspection delays, government errors in risk assessment and industry loopholes in a $595 million terror prevention program passed by Congress in 2006.

Coming a year after a massive explosion at a West, Texas, fertilizer plant, the report points to threats from the release of toxic and flammable chemicals.

Roughly half of the 4,011 high-risk facilities on the Homeland Security Department watch list are in 10 states: California, Texas, Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, Florida, Michigan and New Jersey.

Committee investigators have indicated that larger metropolitan regions such as Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and Philadelphia might be more vulnerable to a chemical attack. The report notes that rural accidents like the West, Texas, plant explosion "pale in comparison with the consequences of releasing large quantities of toxic gas into a densely populated city."

The U.S. effort is "a broken program that is not making us measurably safer against the threat of a terrorist attack," states the report commissioned by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

It said widespread problems have left many of the nation's riskiest chemical facilities "effectively unregulated."

"Today - eight years later - there is little, if any, evidence to show that the more than half a billion dollars DHS has spent created an effective chemical security regulatory program," Coburn said.

The report relies in part on internal DHS documents, including a terror program assessment completed late last year that hasn't been released, and a federal database of higher-risk facilities restricted to the public.

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Your comment has been submitted for approval
captcha 76ce97e54dd141a48b039fd640312b52
Top Classifieds
  • PILLOW TOPmattress sets NEW in plasti ... Details
  • RUNNING, fixable, junk vehicles, equi ... Details
  • Cash for farms & gold (270)339-8 ... Details
  • Washer/Dryer, 2 Dinette Sets, Carpet ... Details
  • Duplex By Owner 3 BR 1 BA each side ... Details
  • SEEING is believing! Don't buy p ... Details
  • Sale by Owner65 Acres inLivingston Co ... Details
  • FHA, USDA, VA & Conventional Loan ... Details
  • OPEN HOUSE 1285 Hedge Ln. OCT 11, 1-4 ... Details
  • 8 Unit Apt. Bldgs. For Sale By Owner ... Details
  • Ford Ranger '86 2WD, $1, 000 2 ... Details
  • Scarlet Red Road Glide 1 owner 33K Mi ... Details
  • Chey El Camino '80 newly restore ... Details
  • 2010 KZ Spree 32.5 ft traveltrailer w ... Details
This Week In Photos
Most Popular
  1. Shootings rock universities in Arizona, Texas
  2. Mustangs clinch district on Senior Night
  3. Nobel Peace Prize gives Tunisia boost
  1. Christian Fellowship founders reflect on work
  2. A civil education
  3. Officers stress traffic stop perils
  1. Shootings rock universities in Arizona, Texas
  2. Mustangs clinch district on Senior Night
  3. Nobel Peace Prize gives Tunisia boost

Check out these recently discussed stories and voice your opinion...