Welcome

Thank you for visiting paducahsun.com, the online home of The Paducah Sun.

Calendar
June 2012
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Click here to submit an event.

Court won't overturn death sentence for Woodall

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to overturn the death sentence of a man who confessed to kidnapping, raping and killing a 16-year-old girl in Kentucky.

The justices ruled 6-3 that Robert Keith Woodall was not entitled to a new sentencing hearing despite his claim that jurors received faulty instructions.

Woodall argued that the trial judge should have told the jury not to draw any negative conclusions about his refusal to take the stand at his 1998 capital sentencing hearing.

Justice Antonin Scalia said the trial judge was under no obligation to instruct the jury about drawing adverse conclusions. Scalia acknowledged that prior Supreme Court precedents have required such instructions during the guilt phase of a criminal trial and in some cases during sentencing. But he said those decisions did not "clearly establish" a broad rule for all sentencing hearings.

Woodall pleaded guilty to kidnapping Hansen on Jan. 25, 1997, from a convenience store in western Kentucky. Woodall acknowledged that he raped the girl and slit her throat twice before taking her body to Luzerne Lake and throwing it in the water. DNA evidence, fingerprints and footprints led to Woodall.

A jury imposed a death sentence, but more than a decade later, a federal court found the jury instructions were flawed and overturned that sentence. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in 2012.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan joined Scalia's opinion reversing the appeals court.

To overturn a death sentence, Scalia said, Woodall had to show the decision involved an "unreasonable application" of clearly established federal law. But that standard can be met "only if the error alleged is so obvious that there could be no fairminded disagreement about its existence," Scalia said.

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Your comment has been submitted for approval
captcha cc3600c1101a4d7681a0cb5ce0f1b4df
Top Classifieds
  • PILLOW TOPmattress sets NEW in pl ... Details
  • Downsizing Due To HealthAntique furni ... Details
  • Dining Room Suite Duncan Phyfe 270-33 ... Details
  • Lot for sale $12000 Kevil 4883522 Details
  • SEEING is believing! Don't b ... Details

Most Popular
  1. Tilghman sees airborne offense as prime focus
  2. Charges dropped in Gray case
  3. Fed less dovish on outlook
  1. Fed less dovish on outlook
  2. Charges dropped in Gray case
  3. Tilghman sees airborne offense as prime focus
  1. Go Guide
  2. Tilghman sees airborne offense as prime focus
  3. Charges dropped in Gray case
Discussion

Check out these recently discussed stories and voice your opinion...