Welcome

Thank you for visiting paducahsun.com, the online home of The Paducah Sun.

Calendar
June 2012
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Click here to submit an event.

Supreme Court showing division in climate case

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court appeared divided on Monday over the sole Obama administration program already in place to limit power plant and factory emissions of gases blamed for global warming.

The justices took on a small, complicated piece of the politically charged issue of cutting greenhouse gas emissions in an extended argument that included references to Dunkin' Donuts stores, football games and light bulbs. The examples were meant to illustrate the vast potential reach of the program, in its critics' view, or its limited nature, as the administration argued.

The presence of Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky in the courtroom underscored the political stakes in President Barack Obama's high-profile effort to deal with global warming - a policy Obama is pursuing after failing to persuade Congress to enact climate change legislation. McConnell is facing a tough re-election fight in which he refers often to the administration's assault on the coal industry in Kentucky and elsewhere.

The court's liberal justices seemed comfortable with the scope of an Environmental Protection Agency permitting program that applies to companies that want to expand facilities or build new ones that would increase overall pollution. Under the program, the companies must evaluate ways to reduce the carbon they release. Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas.

However, conservative members of the bench indicated they're skeptical of the EPA's authority, with Justice Anthony Kennedy as the probable decisive vote. Kennedy seemed most interested in making clear that EPA would retain the ability to combat climate change under earlier high court rulings, regardless of the outcome of this case.

Both sides acknowledged on Monday that the result would not impede EPA's proposal of first-time national standards for new power plants or its regulations for existing plants expected to be proposed this summer. It will then move on to other large stationary sources such as factories.

The permitting program, though, is the first piece of EPA's attempt to reduce carbon output from large sources. Justice Samuel Alito suggested that EPA simply rewrote a provision of the Clean Air Act to justify its permitting program and avoid sweeping in tens of thousands of businesses.

"In the entire history of federal regulation what is the best example you can give us of an agency's doing something like that?" Alito asked Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr.

Comments made about this article - 0 Total

Comment on this article

Your comment has been submitted for approval
captcha 23cfde7463014ed9ab398751d2d9eb3c
Top Classifieds
  • Cocker Spaniel Pups.AKC (270)476-2580 ... Details
  • PILLOWTOP Mattress Sets, NEW in plast ... Details
  • RUNNING, fixable, junk vehicles, equi ... Details
  • 1994 Ardmore by Clayton 16x80 Must be ... Details
  • SEEING is believing! Don't buy p ... Details
  • Lake Front Home 3,000 sq. ft., Kuttaw ... Details
  • 24x44 Mobile Home $3,000/obo Call 270 ... Details
  • 3BR/1BA brick home/3.8 acres, 2424 Gr ... Details
  • 2005 Ford Taurus, 115k miles, exc. co ... Details
This Week In Photos
Most Popular
  1. Auto economic footprint strengthens in Kentucky
  2. Kids on their own among fleeing migrants
  3. Hickman County attorney announces new tax program
  1. Bright outlook for soybeans, corn this year
  2. Cyclist hit, killed by vehicle
  3. School clinics getting high marks
  1. Auto economic footprint strengthens in Kentucky
  2. 10 years old, YouTube valued at $20 billion
  3. School clinics getting high marks
Discussion

Check out these recently discussed stories and voice your opinion...